Households in temporary accommodation
Rotherham · 31 December 2025
On 31 December 2025, 170 households in Rotherham were living in temporary accommodation — 35 of them with children.
Read from MHCLG’s detailed local authority tables, table TA1, in the vintage we archived on 11 August 2026.
170
households
In temporary accommodation in Rotherham on 31 December 2025
86 children were living in those 170 households.
That is 1.5 households in temporary accommodation for every 1,000 households in the area, of which there are about 116,527. The rate across England was 5.5.
That is the 24th-highest rate of the 36 metropolitan districts in the table.
That is 21 more than on 30 September 2025, when it was 149.
Rate among the metropolitan districts, October to December 2025
- … 13 councils between
- out of 36 metropolitan districts in the table
Households in temporary accommodation for every 1,000 households in the area, which is the publisher’s own figure. Councils are compared with councils of their own kind — the table’s only classification is the ONS code — because a London borough beside a rural district is arithmetic without meaning. Councils that did not return data are absent from the ranking rather than counted as nil.
Every quarter we hold
| Quarter | Households | Of those, with children | Children | Per 1,000 households |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q2 | not returned | — | — | — |
| 2024 Q3 | not returned | — | — | — |
| 2024 Q4 | 145 | 38 | 76 | 1.3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 152 | 51 | 94 | 1.3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 149 | 33 | 77 | 1.3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 170 | 35 | 86 | 1.5 |
April to June 2025 is missing from this table. MHCLG published that quarter in a spreadsheet format this pipeline cannot read, so we do not hold it. It is a gap in our record, not a quarter in which nothing was counted, and any comparison on this page names the quarter it actually used.
Each row is a count on one day at the end of the quarter, not a total for the quarter, and it counts households rather than people. A council that did not return data is shown as such; it is never read as nil.